Instructions for Private Public Bill for Judicial Accountability
Form
below is in simple text version of the MSW doc -- it is presented here
for instruction
purposes.
-- Corrections may be made pending
discussions. --
Yellow requires your personal information instead.
Page
1 of 3
Private Calendar No. ______
1___th CONGRESS
_____________ Session H.R. _________________
[Report No.
_______ - _______ ]
_______________________________________________________________
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES UNITED STATES
AND IN THE OTHER HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES United states of America
________, _____2007
Private Attorney
General-in Fact Eddie Leon Andrews, et. al. introduced the
following bill on November 14th 2007 which is ratified by an operation
of law by Nihil dicit (failure) of the Committee of the Judiciary to respond
and is now being filed in the Federal Claims Court
Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed.
________________________________________________________________
A BILL
For the relief of Mr./Mrs./Ms. Your First Middle : Last, Name of Your County, Your State
A Petition and Presentment calling for the Government of united States
to conduct a thorough investigation and Congressional review for the
purposes of REFORM FOR JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY.
Under Rights and Authority granted to We the People
pursuant to the First Amendment to the Constitution for the United
States, granting the Right to seek a Redress of Grievances from the
government, this Petition for a Redress of Grievances against the
Judicial branch of government is respectfully submitted to the
Congress, the House of Representatives and the Senate, of The United States
for action consistent with the Duty and Authority of the members under
their respective Oaths of Office to investigate these Complaints and to
proceed as enunciated below.
Congress has jurisdiction under the broad powers granted by Article I, Section 8
of the Constitution of the UNITED STATES for the United states of
America to establish Rules for the Government (including the
judiciary); to make all Laws
which shall be necessary and proper …; and to provide or
withhold federal funding for the Execution of all Powers vested in the
Government of the United States.
Article III, Section 1
of the Constitution empowers Congress to ordain and establish inferior
courts and to maintain those courts so long as its public officers
exercise “good behaviour”. Under the provisions of
“checks and balances” in our tri-partite Republican form of
government, Congress has a DUTY and the authority to review and to
correct breaches of “good behaviour” [excesses or failures]
of the Executive and/or Judicial branches of government, and where
appropriate, to investigate and prosecute individual public officers
whose performance of the duties of their office offends the conscience of We the People.
page 1 of 3
|
Page 2 of 3
Article III, Section 2
affirms that “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in
Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United
States, …, ”, and further describing controversies to
which the courts may exercise jurisdiction. Accordingly, all courts
ordained and established under Congressional authority shall, as a
duty, exercise judicial powers ONLY in conformance with that
Constitution and just Laws of the United States and shall perform the
duties of office sustaining “good behaviour”.
Article IV, Sections 1 and 2
of the Constitution extends the judicial powers to the States and to
the Citizens of each State, especially the protections of
“Privileges and Immunities” of Citizens subject to the
jurisdiction of the courts.
Article III Section 3
provides that the Testimony of Two witness to the same overt Act is
sufficient to charge these Judicial Officials with acts of
Treason.
Review of conduct by public officers is delegated to
the House of Representatives under Articles of Impeachment, Article I,
sections 2 & 3, and to the Senate for a trial upon Presentment of
impeachment by Congress. Article II Section 4
provides parameters and conditions under which there may be a removal
offense. Congress may set term limits of the judicial officers.
Under authority granted to “We the People”
pursuant to the First Amendment to the Constitution for the United
States granting the Right to seek a Redress of Grievances from Our
government, We the People demand
that this Congress of the united States of America take action in
conformance with its DUTY under that same Constitution for the United
States to Correct and to Reform
the Judicial Branch of government, by whatever means necessary and
appropriate, including the withholding of funds from district or
inferior courts ordained and established by the Congress; and further,
to prosecute those public officers whose conduct violates the
Constitution and Laws of THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the purpose
of restoring InTegrity, for We the People have a right to presume that our judicial system is administered with absolute integrity,
and that the JUDGES -- administrators of justice
-- will perform the duties of their office in strict compliance
with the Code of Judicial Conduct and their Oath of Office
to protect and preserve the constitutional Rights of We the People, Who
demand Accountability of the Judicial Branch of government and its
subsidiary offices.
Be it enacted under this Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America and of this Congress;
assembled under ARTICLE III, authorizing for injured parties, under the
Private Attorney General status, to bring forth penalties for breach of
good behavior standard by any individual or agent who breaches the good
behavior standard of the Constitution or conduct that offends the
conscience; and for violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 3, 241, 242,
and conspiracy to violate 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 thru 1968.
Or rule that 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 thru 1968 is a direct
violation of the Constitutional Rights which challenges
Public Law 80-772 (including Title 18, or the U.S. Criminal Code). Tens
of thousands of federal prisoners prosecuted since 1948 may be affected
by this Congress’ response to this Bill. "Public Law 80-772 is
invalid," First Middle : Last Name
asserts this where the Courts and Congress have made numerous
procedural errors. The law is clear -- an act of Congress cannot become
a law unless it follows each and every procedural step as defined in
"Article I of the U.S. Constitution." A bill originates in either the
House of Representatives or Senate, but its exact text must be approved
by a majority vote in both chambers.
While Congress is in session, that text must be
certified as having been passed in identical form by both Houses (or
"truly enrolled") and then signed by the Speaker of the House and
President pro tempore of the Senate. After, the bill is presented
to the President to sign into law. According to the records, H.R. 3190
was passed by the House on May 12, 1947. The resolution then came
before the Senate, but Congress adjourned before the bill could be
passed. The Senate should have returned the bill to the House to be
resubmitted to the Senate during a later session. Instead, during the
following session, the Senate Committee on the Judiciary continued its
review of H.R. 3190 and added a volume of amendments to the bill. The
Senate passed "H.R. 3190 As Amended," which was sent to the House for a
vote.
Page 2 of 3
|
Page 3 of 3
|
While the House agreed with the amendments, the members failed to vote
on "H.R. 3190 As Amended." According to the Constitution, valid
business is conducted only when Congress is in session and a majority
of members of both Houses are present. Yet, Congress authorized the
House Speaker and President of the Senate to sign enrolled bills during
an adjournment of indefinite length that began on June 20, 1948. This
incomprehensible error was compounded when the Chairman of the
Committee on House Administration mistakenly certified as enrolled the
original H.R. 3190. Still more errors occurred: the House
Speaker and President of the Senate signed the Senate’s "H.R.
3190 As Amended," the bill was then misrepresented to President Truman
as being enrolled, and Truman signed the bill. "Congressional journals
clearly show that the House and Senate each passed two separate bills
that were grossly different. According to the Constitution, this
means that neither bill ever became law," First Middle : Last Name
asserts, agrees with the following: "Under P.L. 80-772, U.S. district
courts were given jurisdiction over all federal offenses. With P.L.
80-772 being invalid, however, the district courts clearly lack
jurisdiction. The convictions and sentences of these prisoners are
therefore void." Countries having extradition treaties with the U.S.
since 1948 and their citizens, who were turned over for trial in U.S.
district courts, also may be affected by the outcome of this Bill.
First Middle : Last Name and other Citizens of the several States are
guranteed to equal protection of the Laws.
The United States shall restore to First Middle : Last Name choices in action in re: State cases in Commonwealth
Court, Superiour Court and York County Court of Common Pleas York
County, Pennsylvania, civil Docket Nos. 00-02472 thru and including
07-06399 and criminal Docket Nos. 1156-04 , SA-0354-07 and others as
indexed in this public record, United States District Court
Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE
#:03-cv-05596-AH, 05cv09324, 06-cv03678 and others as indexed.
The Private Bill affirms evidence of multiple
constitutional violations which inflicts irreparable harm on Citizens
of the several States and upon First Middle : Last Name.
The Private Bill identifies specific acts prohibited
under 42 U.S.C. § 1961 through 18
U.S.C. § 1968 and by government enforcement, commiting
the undersigned into “involutary servitude” pursuant to 18
PaCS § 2902 under “full faith and
credit”. See also 8 U.S.C. § 1481. The undersigned,
serving as ‘private attorney general’ for We the People,
does herewith present a demand to this Congress of the united States to
review the complaints submitted herewith, and to ordain a fact-finding
force or otherwise to investigate the TRUTH of the matters complained
of herein as their DUTY under their respective Oaths of Office in
satisfaction of the First Amendment Rights of We the People to seek a
redress of grievances from our government.
This Congress’ DUTY shall include
investigating all public officers who conspired or may have conspired
to deprive Citizens of the several States and/or First Middle : Last Name
of civil and inalienable rights preserved under the United States
Constitution and the Constitution for the United States, and to
prosecute those individuals whose conduct offends the conscience in
accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and Laws of the
United States of America. These public officers engage in a
“pattern and practice” of criminal acts against We the
People that requires a remedy via Congressional action to enact
legislation for the protection of the Republic and the Constitution of
this Nation.
Sponsered By ________________________________________
|
all 11111
Private Calendar No. ______
1___th
CONGRESS
_____________ Session
H.R. _________________
[Report No. _______ - _______ ]
_______________________________________________________________
IN
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES UNITED STATES
AND
IN THE OTHER HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
United States of America
________,
_____2007
Private
Attorney General-in Fact Eddie Leon Andrews, et. al. introduced the following bill on November 14th 2007
which is ratified by an operation of law by Nihil dicit of the Committee of the
Judiciary to respond
and is now being filed in the Federal Claims Court
Referred to the
Private Calendar and ordered to be printed.
________________________________________________________________
A
BILL
For the relief of
Mr./Mrs./Ms. Your First Middle : Last, Name
of Your County, Your State
A Petition and Presentment calling for the
Government of united States to conduct a thorough investigation and
Congressional review for the purposes of REFORM FOR JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY.
Under Rights and Authority granted
to We the People pursuant to the First Amendment to the Constitution
for the United States, granting the Right to seek a Redress of Grievances from
the government, this Petition for a Redress of Grievances against the Judicial
branch of government is respectfully submitted to the Congress, the House of Representatives and the Senate, of The United States for action
consistent with the Duty and Authority of the members under their respective
Oaths of Office to investigate these Complaints and to proceed as enunciated
below.
Congress
has jurisdiction under the broad powers granted by Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution of the UNITED STATES for
the United states of America to
establish Rules for the Government (including the judiciary); to make all Laws which shall be necessary and
proper …; and to provide or withhold federal funding for the Execution of all
Powers vested in the Government of the United States.
Article III, Section 1
of the Constitution empowers Congress to ordain and establish inferior courts
and to maintain those courts so long as its public officers exercise “good
behaviour”. Under the provisions of “checks and balances” in our tri-partite
Republican form of government, Congress has a DUTY and the authority to review
and to correct breaches of “good behaviour” [excesses or failures] of the
Executive and/or Judicial branches of government, and where appropriate, to
investigate and prosecute individual public officers whose performance of the
duties of their office offends the
conscience of We the People.
|
alll 22
Article III, Section 2
affirms that “The judicial Power shall
extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the
Laws of the United States, …, ”, and further describing controversies to which
the courts may exercise jurisdiction. Accordingly, all courts ordained and
established under Congressional authority shall,
as a duty, exercise judicial powers ONLY in conformance with that Constitution
and just Laws of the United States and shall perform the duties of office
sustaining “good behaviour”.
Article IV, Sections 1 and 2
of the Constitution extends the judicial powers to the States and to the
Citizens of each State, especially the protections of “Privileges and
Immunities” of Citizens subject to the jurisdiction of the courts.
Article III Section 3
provides that the Testimony of Two witness to the same overt Act is sufficient
to charge these Judicial Officials with acts of Treason.
Review
of conduct by public officers is delegated to the House of Representatives
under Articles of Impeachment, Article I, sections 2 & 3, and to the Senate
for a trial upon Presentment of impeachment by Congress. Article II Section 4 provides parameters and conditions under which
there may be a removal offense.
Congress may set term limits of the judicial officers.
Under authority granted to “We the
People” pursuant to the First Amendment to the Constitution
for the United States granting the Right to seek a Redress of Grievances from Our government, We the People demand
that this Congress of the united States of America take action in conformance
with its DUTY under that same Constitution for the United States to Correct and to Reform the Judicial
Branch of government, by whatever means necessary and appropriate, including
the withholding of funds from district or inferior courts ordained and
established by the Congress; and further, to prosecute those public officers
whose conduct violates the Constitution and Laws of THE UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA for the purpose of restoring InTegrity, for We the People have a right to presume
that our judicial system is administered with absolute integrity, and
that the JUDGES -- administrators of justice -- will perform the duties of their
office in strict compliance with the Code of Judicial Conduct and their Oath
of Office to protect and preserve the constitutional Rights of We the
People, Who demand Accountability of the Judicial Branch of
government and its subsidiary offices.
Be
it enacted under this Senate and House of Representatives of the United States
of America and of this Congress; assembled under ARTICLE III, authorizing for injured parties, under
the Private Attorney General status, to bring forth penalties for breach of
good behavior standard by any individual or agent who breaches the good
behavior standard of the Constitution or conduct that offends the conscience;
and for violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 3, 241, 242, and conspiracy to violate 18
U.S.C. §§ 1961 thru 1968. Or rule that
18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 thru 1968 is a direct violation of the Constitutional
Rights which challenges Public Law 80-772 (including Title 18, or
the U.S. Criminal Code). Tens of thousands of federal prisoners prosecuted
since 1948 may be affected by this Congress’ response to this Bill.
"Public Law 80-772 is invalid," First Middle : Last Name asserts this where the
Courts and Congress have made numerous procedural errors. The law is clear --
an act of Congress cannot become a law unless it follows each and every
procedural step as defined in "Article I of the U.S. Constitution." A
bill originates in either the House of Representatives or Senate, but its exact
text must be approved by a majority vote in both chambers.
While Congress is in
session, that text must be certified as having been passed in identical form by
both Houses (or "truly enrolled") and then signed by the Speaker of
the House and President pro tempore of the Senate. After, the bill is presented to the President to sign into law.
According to the records, H.R. 3190 was passed by the House on May 12, 1947.
The resolution then came before the Senate, but Congress adjourned before the
bill could be passed. The Senate should have returned the bill to the House to
be resubmitted to the Senate during a later session. Instead, during the
following session, the Senate Committee on the Judiciary continued its review
of H.R. 3190 and added a volume of amendments to the bill. The Senate passed
"H.R. 3190 As Amended," which was sent to the House for a
vote.
|
alll 33
While the House agreed with the
amendments, the members failed to vote on "H.R. 3190 As Amended." According to the Constitution, valid
business is conducted only when Congress is in session and a majority of
members of both Houses are present. Yet, Congress authorized the House Speaker
and President of the Senate to sign enrolled bills during an adjournment of
indefinite length that began on June 20, 1948. This incomprehensible error was
compounded when the Chairman of the Committee on House Administration
mistakenly certified as enrolled the original H.R. 3190. Still more errors occurred: the House Speaker and President of the
Senate signed the Senate’s "H.R. 3190 As Amended," the bill
was then misrepresented to President Truman as being enrolled, and Truman
signed the bill. "Congressional journals clearly show that the House and
Senate each passed two separate bills that were grossly different. According to the Constitution, this means
that neither bill ever became law," First Middle : Last Name
asserts, agrees with the following: "Under P.L. 80-772, U.S.
district courts were given jurisdiction over all federal offenses. With P.L.
80-772 being invalid, however, the district courts clearly lack jurisdiction.
The convictions and sentences of these prisoners are therefore void."
Countries having extradition treaties with the U.S. since 1948 and their
citizens, who were turned over for trial in U.S. district courts, also may be
affected by the outcome of this Bill. First Middle : Last Name and other Citizens of the several States are guranteed to
equal protection of the Laws.
The
United States shall restore to First Middle : Last Name choices in action in re: State cases in
Commonwealth Court,
Superiour Court and York County Court of Common Pleas York County,
Pennsylvania, civil Docket Nos. 00-02472 thru and including 07-06399 and
criminal Docket Nos. 1156-04 , SA-0354-07 and others as indexed in this public
record, United States District
Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #:03-cv-05596-AH, 05cv09324, 06-cv03678 and others as indexed.
The Private Bill affirms
evidence of multiple constitutional violations which inflicts irreparable harm
on Citizens of the several States and upon First Middle : Last Name.
The Private Bill
identifies specific acts prohibited under 42 U.S.C. § 1961 through 18 U.S.C. § 1968 and by
government enforcement, commiting the undersigned into “involutary servitude”
pursuant to 18 PaCS § 2902 under “full
faith and credit”. See also 8 U.S.C. § 1481. The undersigned, serving as ‘private attorney
general’ for We the People, does herewith present a demand to this Congress of
the united States to review the complaints submitted herewith, and to ordain a
fact-finding force or otherwise to investigate the TRUTH of the matters
complained of herein as their DUTY under their respective Oaths of Office in
satisfaction of the First Amendment Rights of We the People to seek a redress
of grievances from our government.
This Congress’ DUTY
shall include investigating all public officers who conspired or may have
conspired to deprive Citizens of the several States and/or First Middle : Last Name
of civil and inalienable rights preserved under the United States Constitution
and the Constitution for the United States, and to prosecute those individuals
whose conduct offends the conscience in accordance with the provisions of the
Constitution and Laws of the United States of America. These public officers
engage in a “pattern and practice” of criminal acts against We the People that
requires a remedy via Congressional action to enact legislation for the
protection of the Republic and the Constitution of this Nation.
Sponsered by _________________________________
|
|